Cases 1 - 8 of 8
C. et al v. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
as 1:2024cv06086
Defendant:
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Plaintiff:
C. C. and Yolanda Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gjermo, Lee et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2016cv00788
Plaintiff:
Lee B. Gjermo , Monica Gerner , ToRoc LLC and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03765
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03583
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03463
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, Washington State, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03127
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ANAEME v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv00199
Defendant:
ED, JESICCA, MR ACEVADO and others
Plaintiff:
CHIBUEZE C. ANAEME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
NO BALONEY MARKETING, LLC et al v. RYAN et al
as 1:2009cv00200
Plaintiff:
NO BALONEY MARKETING, LLC, PETER G. TAMULONIS, PETER J. TAMULONIS and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM F. RYAN, FRANK BROWN, LAMAR BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
