Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Pope v. Rios et al
as 1:2020cv01784
Defendant:
Mark Hewitt, Warden Ricardo Rios, Amber Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Jermel Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boose v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2019cv08505
Plaintiff:
Ollie Boose
Defendant:
C.O. France and Warden Teri Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Junious, AnQuin v. Pollard
as 3:2019cv01003
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility and CCI Prison Facility
Respondent:
Warden Pollard
Petitioner:
AnQuin St. Junious
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wisnauski v. Kendall County et al
as 1:2018cv05530
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare employee Jimmy McCorkle, Kendall County Deputy Garth Rasmussen, Advanced Correctional Healthcare employee David Miller, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wisnauski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turi Joseph v. Tracy Engleson, et al
as 18-2627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TURI J. JOSEPH, also known as Joseph Turi
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY ENGLESON, TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden, RALPH BIRKYBILE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-2561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clark v. Varga et al
as 3:2018cv50247
Defendant:
James Martens, Warden John Varga and Ms. Benitez
Plaintiff:
Keith Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermel Pope v. William Holzapel, et al
as 18-2383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMEL POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM HOLZAPEL, Captain, MILINDA KING, Assistant Warden and JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden
Jermel Pope v. Jeffrey Krueger, et al
as 18-2136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMEL POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, SARA M. REVELL, Regional Director, STEVE SELLERS, UNICOR Factory Manager and others
Adam Pegues v. John Coe, et al
as 18-2066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM PEGUES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN COE, STEPHEN DUNCAN, Warden, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
