Cases 31 - 40 of 359
Marissa Darlingh v. Adria Maddaleni, et al
as 23-1610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARISSA DARLINGH
Defendant / Appellee:
ADRIA MADDALENI, THERESE FREIBERG, OPHELIA KING and others
Anikka King v. Tom Broderick, et al
as 23-1584
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANIKKA KING
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM BRODERICK and CITY OF ANDERSON, INDIANA
King-Banks, Melissa v. Parisi, Joe et al
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sue King-Banks and Melissa King
Defendant:
Joe Parisi, Journey, Safe Haven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King Sykes LLC v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
King Sykes LLC
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Maurice Cox, Samir Mayekar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
King-Banks, Melissa v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sue King-Banks
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Knox County et al
as 4:2023cv04034
Plaintiff:
Jon Benson
Defendant:
Knox County, Sheriff Jack Harlan, Jr., Deputy Shawn Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dejuan Mason v. Walworth County Child Support Enforcement Agency, et al
as 23-1300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEJUAN A. MASON
Defendant / Appellee:
WALWORTH COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, LEE HUMPNER and TEAHARA KING
Joseph v. Waushara County et al
as 1:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Luke A Joseph
Defendant:
Waushara County, Donna Kalata, Mark S Piechowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
King v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07001
Plaintiff:
Joshua King
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
