Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Cornel J. Rosario v. Daniel R. Brawn, et al
as 11-2072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNEL J. ROSARIO, as Special Administrator of the Estate of MARC J. ROSARIO, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL R. BRAWN, JEFFREY A. SCHWITZ and ADAM C. WINKLER
Rosario v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv00456
Plaintiff:
Sandra Rosario
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Rafael Magallon #19170 , Angeilly Lopez #2768 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario et al v. City of Chicago, a municipal corporation et al
as 1:2010cv06067
Plaintiff:
Ramonita Rosario and Maritza Figueroa
Defendant:
City of Chicago, a municipal corporation , Michael J Cosentino, John A Lewison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario et al v The Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv01512
Plaintiff:
George Rosario , Eusebio Razo , Ervin Ternoir and others
Defendant:
The Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Chicago, Stephanie D. Neely, Steven J. Lux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosario v. Brawn et al
as 2:2009cv00590
Plaintiff:
Cornel J Rosario and Cornel J Rosario
Defendant:
Daniel R Brawn, Jeffrey A Schwitz and Adam C Winkler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montijo-Flores v. Sedlock et al
as 1:2009cv02459
Petitioner:
Rosario Montijo-Flores
Respondent:
Daniel J. Sedlock, Jr., Keith Nygren and Ricardo Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Juarez et al v. Herrera et al
as 1:2007cv00685
Plaintiff:
Geronimo Juarez, Rosa Juarez, Osvaldo Juarez and others
Defendant:
Keith Herrera, Chicago Police Officer #1 and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
