Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Christopher Sanders v. Elizabeth Vargas, et al
as 12-2371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH VARGAS, Probation Agent, NEIL THORESON, Supervisor, SALLY TESS, Regional Chief and others
Neil Aslin v. Financial Industry Regulatory
as 12-2250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEIL J. ASLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cindy Abbott, et al v. Sangamon County, et al
as 12-1121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CINDY C. ABBOTT and TRAVIS ABBOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
SANGAMON COUNTY, ILLINOIS, a Body Politic, NEIL WILLIAMSON, Sheriff, Sangamon County, Illinois and TROY M. SWEENEY, Deputy Sheriff, Sangamon County, Illinois
White v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv07037
Plaintiff:
Thomas White
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Jeffrey Chudy , Thomas Wake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corbett v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv05025
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Corbett
Defendant:
The United States of America , John Grady , Virginia Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Williamson et al
as 3:2011cv03224
Plaintiff:
Franchot B Taylor
Defendant:
Neil Williamson, Terry Durr, William Strayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aslin v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
as 1:2011cv04123
Plaintiff:
Neil J Aslin
Defendant:
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher M. Sanders v. Elizabeth Vargas, et al
as 11-2207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH VARGAS, Probation Agent, NEIL THORESON, Supervisor, SALLY TESS, Regional Chief and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
