Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Jackson v. City of Harvey Police Department et al
as 1:2011cv05609
Defendant:
City of Harvey Police Department, City of Harvey Police Officer Adams, Lake Station Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne A Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Satkar Hospitality Inc et al
as 1:2010cv06682
Plaintiff:
Satkar Hospitality Inc , sharad k dani and harish dani
Defendant:
Cook County Board of Review, The, larry r rogers, Joseph Berrios and others
Garnishee:
dennis g lacomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Handley et al v. Lake Station City of et al
as 2:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Billy J Handley and Martin Handley
Defendant:
Lake Station City of , Lake Station Police Department , Officer W Hite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv06810
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stewart and D. V.
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Richard Maclin, Sabrina Mundein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Austin v. Speedway Gas Station et al
as 3:2009cv00244
Plaintiff:
Clarence A. Austin
Defendant:
Speedway Gas Station and Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
