Cases 1 - 10 of 981
Jason Arnold v. Kevin Gillis, et al
as 24-1964
Plaintiff:
JASON P. ARNOLD
Defendant:
KEVIN GILLIS, JOSH CHRISTMAN, WILLIAM FISHER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Patrick v. Spradley et al
as 1:2024cv04377
Plaintiff:
Kiyan Patrick
Defendant:
Ernest Spradley, Jake Schmeisser, Ravyn Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Anderson v. Kocoras
as 1:2024cv03580
Plaintiff:
Alyce R Anderson
Defendant:
Charles P Kocoras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Bengtson, Mitchell v. Carlson, Christen et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Mitchell E. Bengston and Mitchell E. Bengtson
Defendant:
Christen A. Carlson, Eric P. Carlson, Peter Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon Jr. et al v. Lammert et al
as 1:2024cv02891
Plaintiff:
Temmy L. Dixon Jr., Cirsten M. Nunn and The City of Chicago
Defendant:
Timothy M. Lammert, Daniel P. Condreva and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merritt v. Wood et al
as 1:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
Dennis R Merritt
Defendant:
Andrea Wood, Diane P. Wood, Amy J. St. Eve and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
