Civil Rights Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Lewis v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv16229
Plaintiff: Gary Lewis
Defendant: City of Chicago, D Prothro, C Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miles v. Doherty, Star #21115 et al
as 1:2021cv04176
Plaintiff: Conny L Miles
Defendant: Chicago Police Detective Chris Doherty, Star #21115, Chicago Police Detective Joseph Marszalec, Star #21234, Chicago Police Officer Johnson, Star #8265 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03712
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Radford v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv05637
Plaintiff: David Radford
Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO, Thomas Doherty and Wade Golab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al v. Doherty et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv50285
Plaintiff: Michael Riggs, Ivan Holland, Dayna Schultz and others
Defendant: Gary Caruana, Eugene Doherty and Winnebago County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Toledo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03054
Defendant: Peter Toledo, Kyle Lang, City Of Chicago and others
Plaintiff: Marxavier Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bertha v. Kane County et al
as 1:2020cv01046
Defendant: Kane County, Ronald Hain, Clint Hul and others
Plaintiff: David A Bertha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herron v. Doherty et al
as 2:2020cv00085
Defendant: Molly Doherty and Alexandra Wild
Plaintiff: Janika Auriel Herron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv03295
Plaintiff: Carl Pearson
Defendant: City Of Chicago, Brian Kinnane, Anthony Babicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00397
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?