Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Aponte et al v. Bradley et al
as 1:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Pedro Aponte and Kate Diaz
Defendant:
Trooper Kevin Bradley and Unknown Trooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Irvin v. Exeter Finance
as 1:2023cv13873
Plaintiff:
Tyrae Irvin
Defendant:
Golf Mill Chevrolet, Asbel Diaz Ruiz, Nathaniel Devitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gray v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Pamela D Gray
Defendant:
Officer J Williams #1958F, Officer Diaz and Officer J Williams
Not Classified By Court:
Scott Bunnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. Guevara et al
as 1:2023cv02575
Plaintiff:
Angel Diaz
Defendant:
Reynaldo Guevara, CITY OF CHICAGO and Geri Lynn Yanow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
