Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Macias v. Pitassi et al
as 1:2023cv13988
Plaintiff:
Enzo Macias
Defendant:
Sam J. Pitassi and The Village of Melrose Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MACIAS v. VERTA et al
as 1:2023cv03335
Plaintiff:
JOSE R MACIAS
Defendant:
RAYMOND VERTA, THOMAS PURTELL JR. and THE CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brandt Construction Co. v. City of Moline et al
as 4:2021cv04111
Defendant:
City of Moline, Scott Williams, Matt Timion and others
Plaintiff:
Brandt Construction Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calvin Lindsey v. Vince Macias, et al
as 17-2963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN LINDSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
VINCE MACIAS, Chicago Police Officer, Star #8042, VICKY PEREZ, Chicago Police Officer, Star #15657, PAUL GENTILE, Chicago Police Officer, Star #4916 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Macias v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv01835
Plaintiff:
Esperanza Macias
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Vincent Baldassano, Jeffrey Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
