Cases 1 - 10 of 743
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Vitellaro v. City of Park Ridge et al
as 1:2024cv04797
Plaintiff:
Michael Vitellaro
Defendant:
City of Park Ridge, Frank Kaminski, Lynn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Calamus et al
as 1:2024cv04754
Plaintiff:
Steven Jenkins
Defendant:
Zachary Calamus, Arleta Kochan, Brendan Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Patel et al v. Village of Melrose Park et al
as 1:2024cv04389
Plaintiff:
Sunny Patel and Shiva Hospitality Corp d/b/a Fairbridge Inn Express
Defendant:
Village of Melrose Park, Ronald M Serpico, Ralph Sorce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Boehmer v. Park et al
as 1:2024cv03855
Plaintiff:
Michael Boehmer
Defendant:
Village of Melrose Park, Officer Santillan, Officer Rossi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
