Cases 111 - 120 of 121
Shaw v. Breen et al
as 3:2008cv00490
Plaintiff:
Sergio L. Shaw
Defendant:
Martha Breen, Janelle Nickel, DYLAN RADTKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. GRAMS et al
as 3:2008cv00458
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Hudson
Defendant:
GREGORY GRAMS, MARC CLEMENTS, Rick Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reetz v. Londre et al
as 1:2008cv00339
Plaintiff:
Edmund James Reetz
Defendant:
Scott Londre, Mark Hansen, Nickel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wine v. GRAMS et al
as 3:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Wine
Defendant:
GREGORY GRAMS, JANEL NICKEL, Daniel Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASQUEZ v. NICKEL et al
as 3:2007cv00724
Plaintiff:
LUIS VASQUEZ
Defendant:
JOHN NICKEL, Joshua Fletcher, PLYER KMIECIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norwood v. Capt. Radtke, et al
as 3:2007cv00634
Plaintiff:
Charles Lamont Norwood
Defendant:
Captain Radtke, Janelle Nickel, GRAMS, WARDEN GREG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. RADTKE et al
as 3:2007cv00624
Petitioner:
Charles Lamont Norwood
Defendant:
CAPTAIN RADTKE, Officer Graak, MIKE VANDENBROOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ravesteijn et al v. GRAMS et al
as 3:2007cv00572
Plaintiff:
Reinier Ravesteijn and ROBERT B. CIARPAGLINI
Defendant:
GREGORY GRAMS, MARC CLEMENTS, JANEL NICKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPEIGHTS, JAEL v. RAEMISCH, RICK
as 3:2007cv00542
Plaintiff:
JAEL SPEIGHTS
Defendant:
RICK RAEMISCH, GREG GRAMS, JANEL NICKEL and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Redmond v. Grams et al
as 2:2007cv00616
Plaintiff:
Rodney James Redmond
Defendant:
Gregory Grams, William Pollard, Michael Baenen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
