Cases 31 - 40 of 2,502
Smith v Superintendent
as 3:2018cv00917
Respondent:
Superintendent
Petitioner:
Jeramey Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Defendant:
Superintendent Ron Neal, Jane Doe or John Doe, C Dustin and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Ronald J Pierce
Undetermined:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Superintendent et al
as 3:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Elmer Bryant
Defendant:
Superintendent and C A Penfold
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GADSON v. SUPERINTENDENT,
as 2:2018cv00019
Petitioner:
BRYAN T. GADSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COX v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04667
Petitioner:
BILLY COX
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MANLY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04629
Petitioner:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TUCKER v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04643
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
TONY ALLEN TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MANLY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04630
Petitioner:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BILLINGSLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv04642
Petitioner:
ELIGHA BILLINGSLEY
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 3:2017cv00211
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
LESLEY JACKSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
