Cases 31 - 40 of 1,552
Diaz-Perez v. Kinnick et al
as 3:2023cv50173
Plaintiff:
Bernard Diaz-Perez
Defendant:
Mr. Kinnick, Mr. Moissant, United States Of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Davis
as 1:2023cv03620
Plaintiff:
DaRayl D Davis and United States of America
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Wasik v. USA
as 3:2023cv01591
Petitioner:
Grant Clark Wasik
Respondent:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hubbard v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv50238
Petitioner:
Quincy Hubbard
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Belton v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01248
Petitioner:
Emanucel Belton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Butler v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv50125
Plaintiff:
Mikle Antony Butler
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Vining v. Ciolli, Jr. et al
as 3:2023cv50088
Plaintiff:
Jerome Vining
Defendant:
Andrew Ciolli, Jr. and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Muhammad-Curtis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv02761
Petitioner:
Lenolis Muhammad-Curtis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States of America v. Jones
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
Broderick Jones and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Collins v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02093
Petitioner:
Christine Anita Collins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
