Cases 31 - 40 of 1,550
Diaz-Perez v. Kinnick et al
as 3:2023cv50173
Plaintiff:
Bernard Diaz-Perez
Defendant:
Mr. Kinnick, Mr. Moissant, United States Of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wasik v. USA
as 3:2023cv01591
Petitioner:
Grant Clark Wasik
Respondent:
United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Muhammad-Curtis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv02761
Petitioner:
Lenolis Muhammad-Curtis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Collins v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02093
Petitioner:
Christine Anita Collins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Butler v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv50125
Plaintiff:
Mikle Antony Butler
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Purdy v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03124
Petitioner:
Brock A Purdy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Belton v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01113
Petitioner:
Emanucel Belton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanford v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv02061
Petitioner:
Cory Sanford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gray v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv04044
Petitioner:
Lee Dwayne Gray
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Vining v. Ciolli, Jr. et al
as 3:2023cv50088
Plaintiff:
Jerome Vining
Defendant:
Andrew Ciolli, Jr. and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
