Cases 41 - 50 of 346
Richardson v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50373
Petitioner:
Jerome Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Moore v. Gonzalez
as 3:2022cv50355
Petitioner:
Joshua J. Moore
Respondent:
D. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Balderas v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2022cv01098
Plaintiff:
Juan Balderas
Defendant:
Rolando Gonzalez and Milwaukee Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v.Bergami
as 3:2022cv50318
Petitioner:
Craig Carroll
Respondent:
United States of America, Thomas Bergami and D. Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gonzalez, Pablo v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2022cv00513
Petitioner:
Pablo Gonzalez
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pabon-Gonzalez v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2022cv01009
Petitioner:
Helson Pabon-Gonzalez, Jr
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gonzalez v. Segal
as 1:2022cv01270
Petitioner:
Conrad J Gonzalez
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shannon Williams v. C.W. Cox
as 22-2407
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHANNON WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden, D. GONZALEZ, JR. and C. W. COX
Gonzalez v. Neal
as 3:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Eugenio Gonzalez
Defendant:
Ron Neal
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coulter v. Lake County Public Defender Office et al
as 2:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Jamson Coulter
Defendant:
Lake County Public Defender Office, Benjamen W Murphy, Marce Gonzalez Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
