Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Carroll v. Meyers
as 1:2013cv00099
Petitioner:
Paul Raymond Carroll
Respondent:
Richard Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Carroll et al
as 1:2012cv08580
Plaintiff:
Tirnell Lamone Williams
Defendant:
M A Carroll and E Bracamontes, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubble v. Freeport Health Care Network et al
as 3:2012cv50291
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hubble
Defendant:
Freeport Health Care Network , Carol Huffine, Carroll County Jail & Medical Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Kerrkee et al
as 3:2011cv00633
Plaintiff:
Mark A Carroll, II
Defendant:
Mike Kerrkee, Dennis Middendorff, Clinton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPherron v. Dailing et al
as 3:2011cv50011
Petitioner:
Patrick S. McPherron
Respondent:
Phillip Dailing, Joseph W. Carroll and Christopher Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carroll-Bey v. Cross
as 3:2010cv01040
Petitioner:
Gerald Roderick Carroll-Bey
Respondent:
James Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McPherron v. Ulmer et al
as 3:2010cv50322
Plaintiff:
Patrick S. McPherron
Defendant:
Phil Ulmer, Phillip Dailing, Joseph W. Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Furlong et al
as 3:2010cv01001
Plaintiff:
Ted Knox
Defendant:
Doctor Furlong, Terry Caliper, Kathy Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. McCann et al
as 1:2009cv07772
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wilson
Defendant:
Terry McCann, Major Lake, Sergeant Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Truss v. Chrisham et al
as 3:2009cv50270
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Truss
Defendant:
John Chrisham, Nedra Chandler, Vianne Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
