Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Carpenter v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv01927
Petitioner:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crayton v. Mitchell
as 4:2023cv04062
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bush v. Myers et al
as 3:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
Chevelle Bush
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leger v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
William P Leger, Jr
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv50036
Petitioner:
Denzel Reid
Respondent:
People of Illinois and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Poor v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
William Poor
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Mitchell, W. Lawless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sumlin v. Mitchell
as 1:2023cv00638
Petitioner:
Marvin Sumlin
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMullen v. Mitchell
as 3:2022cv03072
Petitioner:
William McMullen
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv00006
Petitioner:
LaShawn Russell
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCall v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv02569
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. McCall, Sr.
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Mitchell, Daniel L. Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
