Cases 41 - 50 of 164
Griffin v. Jones et al
as 1:2009cv01298
Petitioner:
Dwayne Griffin
Respondent:
Eddie Jones, Joseph Mathy, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnnie Henderson v. Eddie Jones, et al
as 09-3077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNIE HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE JONES, Warden, Deputy Director in his individual and official capacity, MALCOLM DAVISON, Major at Pontiac Correctional Center in his individual and official capacity, DAVID LINGLE, Committee Chairperson in his individual and official capacity and others
Thomas v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2009cv03200
Plaintiff:
Lamont G Thomas
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Michael Randle, James Sledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Crockett v. Eddie Jones
as 09-2745
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES CROCKETT
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDIE JONES, Warden
James v. Lewis et al
as 1:2009cv01221
Plaintiff:
Douglas James
Defendant:
Joseph Lewis, Joseph Lewis, McBurnie and others
Respondent:
Smithson and Smithson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Gilson et al
as 1:2009cv03195
Petitioner:
Dwayne Griffin
Respondent:
Kevin L. Gilson and Eddie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Gilson et al
as 3:2009cv00382
Petitioner:
Dwayne Griffin
Respondent:
Kevill Gilson, Eddie Jones and IL Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Suh v. Jones et al
as 1:2009cv01131
Plaintiff:
Andrew P Suh, Andrew P Suh and Andrew P Suh
Defendant:
Eddie Jones, Joseph Mathy, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Barrow v. Koko et al
as 1:2009cv01127
Plaintiff:
Henry Barrow
Defendant:
. Koko, Eddie Jones, . Garlick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bell v. Jones
as 1:2008cv05622
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bell
Defendant:
Eddie Jones
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
