Cases 51 - 60 of 61
Smith v. Superintendent
as 3:2011cv00264
Petitioner:
Michael Smith
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jesse Phillips v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 11-1113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, LEE RYKER, Warden of the Lawrence Correctional Center, JULIE MORRIS and others
Smith v. Attorney General of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2010cv03861
Petitioner:
Michael Smith
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Cook County et al
as 3:2010cv00034
Petitioner:
Jesse Phillips and Jesse Phillips
Respondent:
Ruth Rothstein, Thomas Dart, Michael Sheahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Smith v. Donald Hulick
as 08-2001
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden
Michael Smith v. Donald Hulick
as 08-1403
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07072
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07073
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07069
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07070
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
