Cases 81 - 90 of 131
Hyde v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2015cv01139
Plaintiff:
Ronald W Hyde
Defendant:
Lashbrook, Edwards, Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Davis v. Christine Brown, et al
as 15-2442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE BROWN, Nurse, BRENDA GALE, L.P.N., improperly named in complaint as Nurse Garil, KEITH E. HUBLER, Lieutenant and others
Marc Norfleet v. Vipin Shah, et al
as 15-2401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC NORFLEET
Defendant - Appellee:
VIPIN K. SHAH, Doctor, CHRISTINE BROWN, DONALD GAETZ and others
Robin Smith v. Donald Gaetz, et al
as 15-2340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBIN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD GAETZ, CHRISTINE BROWN, Health Care Unit Administrator, VIPIN K. SHAH, Doctor and others
Holmes v. Shah et al
as 3:2015cv00667
Plaintiff:
Montrell Holmes
Defendant:
V Shah, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Lauren Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Espinoza v. Godinez et al
as 3:2015cv00639
Defendant:
Salvador A. Godinez, Daniel Conn, Louis Shicker and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos E Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. Spiller et al
as 3:2015cv00514
Plaintiff:
Victor Nunez
Defendant:
Thomas Spiller, Vipin Shah, Christine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Duncan v. Thomas Spiller, et al
as 15-1783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL R. DUNCAN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS A. SPILLER, MICHAEL EDWARDS and CHRISTINE BROWN
Charles Sultan v. Christine Brown, et al
as 15-1676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SULTAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE BROWN, also known as C. Brown, JAMES FENOGLIO, Doctor, Medical Director, Lawrence Correctional Center, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Johnson v. Shah et al
as 3:2015cv00344
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Vipin K Shah, Christine Brown and Angel Rector
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
