Cases 81 - 90 of 5,949
James Freer v. Correctional Officer Lincoln, et al
as 24-2213
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINCOLN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARRIBEAU and JOHN DOES
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. FREER
Davis v. Leposky et al
as 3:2024cv01717
Defendant:
Garrett Leposky, C/O Garcia, C/O E. and others
Plaintiff:
DeAndre K Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01719
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Latoya Hughes, Karl R Bradford and others
Plaintiff:
Antwon Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ausby v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01712
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, John Doe and Latoya Hughes
Plaintiff:
Emerald M Ausby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentz v. Ball et al
as 3:2024cv03191
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Berry., John Doe #3 and #4, Brittany Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrece Coleman v. Ariel Martinez, et al
as 24-2190
Plaintiff:
TYRECE D. COLEMAN
Defendant:
ARIEL MARTINEZ, Officer and JOHN DOE, Sergeant
Castile v. Bower et al
as 1:2024cv01245
Defendant:
. Bower, Jessica .., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Yaphet Castile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai, Annamalai v. United States Attorney General et al
as 3:2024cv00469
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John & Doe 1-50, Kathleen M. Kenney and others
Plaintiff:
Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar and Annamalai Annamalai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carradine v. Racine Police Officer John Doe 1 et al
as 2:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Robert Carradine
Defendant:
Christopher M Botsch, Caledonia Police Officer John Doe 2, Racine Police Officer John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Regan v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01693
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
