Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dahl v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dahl
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Unknown IDOC Directors, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv02429
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dohl and Brandon Dahl
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01332
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and Unknown IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Gonzales v. John Baldwin, et al
as 23-1756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO GONZALES
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BALDWIN, IDOC Director, ALONZO L. BOARDMAN, Sgt., JACOB DALTON, Correctional Officer, Lt. and others
Parker v. Jeffreys
as 1:2020cv02764
Defendant:
IDOC Director Rob Jeffreys
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkinson v. Doe's et al
as 1:2020cv01740
Defendant:
Chief Engineer, John Doe's, Sheridan C. C. and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balal Hardaway v. Sara Faetanini, et al
as 18-1957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BALAL HARDAWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SARA FAETANINI, KUL SOOD, Doctor, STEPHEN RITZ, Corporate Utilization Manager, Medical Director and others
Scott Peters v. John Baldwin, et al
as 18-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT PETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN BALDWIN, IDOC Director, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK and UNKNOWN PARTY, John or Jane Doe Mailroom Director
Nichols v. IDOC Director et al
as 3:2016cv01101
Petitioner:
Demetrius M Nichols
Respondent:
IDOC Director and Kimberly Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
