Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rogers et al v. Rockford Housing Authority et al
as 3:2013cv50054
Plaintiff: James Rogers
Defendant: Rockford Housing Authority, Metro Police, Rockford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Fredricks et al
as 1:2010cv05714
Plaintiff: Cordell Sanders
Defendant: Lieutenant Fredricks, James Rogers, Correctional Officer Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Downey et al
as 1:2010cv01257
Plaintiff: James Rogers
Defendant: Michael D Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew, . Brazille and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Downey et al
as 2:2010cv02180
Plaintiff: James Rogers
Defendant: Michael D Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew, . Brazille and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Restricted Filer v Superintendent
as 3:2009cv00074
Petitioner: Arthur James Rogers
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers v. Superintendent
as 3:2008cv00182
Petitioner: Arthur James Rogers
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Indiana State Prison Superintendent
as 3:2007cv00567
Petitioner: Arthur James Rogers
Respondent: Indiana State Prison Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Buss
as 3:2007cv00569
Petitioner: Arthur James Rogers
Respondent: Edward Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Buss
as 3:2007cv00565
Petitioner: Arthur James Rogers
Respondent: Edward Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Buss
as 3:2007cv00563
Petitioner: Arthur James Rogers
Respondent: Edward Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?