Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Whitmore v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Whitmore
Defendant:
Ronald L. Davis, Michael Downey, Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hill v. Perkins et al
as 1:2024cv01812
Plaintiff:
Deonte Hill
Defendant:
Perkins, Thomas J Dart and Cook County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv04172
Plaintiff:
Shamar M. Perkins
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Services, Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, Rushville City Post Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christmas v. Appell et al
as 2:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
Michael Christmas
Defendant:
. Appell, E Senesac, P Denault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bond v. Cruse et al
as 3:2023cv02721
Plaintiff:
Demond Lee Bond
Defendant:
Zina R Cruse, Bernadette Schramph and Virgil Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Perkins
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and W Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Perkins
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and William Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Koltiwenzew et al
as 1:2022cv07301
Plaintiff:
Feliberto Flores Ramos
Defendant:
Chad Koltiwenzew, Todd, Corporal Bartucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Dodd et al
as 3:2022cv03234
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Perkins
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and W Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. USA
as 3:2022cv01883
Petitioner:
Larry D. Perkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
