Cases 1 - 10 of 240
Blanchard v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50374
Defendant:
Watson, Hefferman, Shaw and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Danley et al
as 2:2024cv02203
Plaintiff:
Michael Rodriguez
Defendant:
Kirk Kepley and Jesse Paul Danley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv50314
Defendant:
Aroyal, Raviden, Tarry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Balogh et al
as 1:2024cv05715
Defendant:
Tom Dart, A. Balogh, E. Villarreal and others
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Rodriguez v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50233
Petitioner:
Julian Martinez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Honey v. Lombardi et al
as 1:2024cv02859
Plaintiff:
Devontae H. Honey
Defendant:
Lombardi, Rodriguez, Cook County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Castanedo et al
as 3:2024cv50112
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee
Defendant:
Michael Castanedo, Samantha Rodriguez and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Dixon Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv50044
Plaintiff:
Dorenzo Moore
Defendant:
Dixon Correctional Center, Tarry Williams, Kim Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50001
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
