Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Chao v. Wheeler
as 3:2008cv03024
Petitioner:
Elaine L Chao
Respondent:
Ronald D Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chao v. Loughrey
as 1:2008cv00193
Petitioner:
Elaine L. Chao and Elaine L. Chao
Respondent:
James Loughrey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chao v. Vasilko et al
as 1:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
Elaine L Chao and Elaine L Chao
Defendant:
Michael J. Vasilko, Vasilko Architects and Associates, Inc. and Vasilko, Hauserman and Associates 401(k) Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
CHAO v. BUVANTO, INC. et al
as 3:2007cv00143
Plaintiff:
ELAINE L. CHAO
Defendant:
BUVANTO, INC. and KENNETH E. BUTLER, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chao v. Vogt et al
as 2:2007cv00900
Plaintiff:
Elaine L Chao
Defendant:
Ron Vogt and Deliciously Different Employee Savings Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chao v. Big Ridge, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00708
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Big Ridge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chao v. Miczek et al
as 2:2007cv00875
Plaintiff:
Elaine L Chao and Elaine L Chao
Defendant:
Peter Miczek and Adicon Consulting & Design
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chao v. Zeisel et al
as 1:2007cv05507
Plaintiff:
Elaine L Chao and Elaine L Chao
Defendant:
Henry Zeisel and Health Care Services Corporation 401(k) Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Chao v. Micro, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv05420
Plaintiff:
Elaine L. Chao and Elaine L. Chao
Defendant:
Micro, Inc., Dawn Matthews, Terry Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
CHAO v. EFM ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01121
Plaintiff:
ELAINE L. CHAO
Defendant:
EFM ASSOCIATES, INC. and ALVARO MONTANO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
