Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01986
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, DAVID A. RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
PRESTON v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2020cv02978
Plaintiff:
June Preston
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
CLARK v. ELI LILLY AND CO.
as 1:2020cv00671
Plaintiff:
Ruth Clark
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
HERR v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2019cv04294
Defendant:
ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH INCORPORATED, ELI LILLY BONUS PLAN, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE HERR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ALLEN v. THE LILLY EXTENDED DISABILITY PLAN et al
as 1:2016cv02224
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ALLEN
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY LIFE INSURANCE AND DEATH BENEFIT PLAN and THE LILLY EXTENDED DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MULLEN v. LILLY USA, LLC, et al
as 1:2015cv02007
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROSE MULLEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
HUDSON v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2014cv00608
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
HAROLD DONALD HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
JONES v. ELY STOKES, INC
as 1:2013cv01419
Defendant:
ELY STOKES, INC
Plaintiff:
BRUCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
COBB v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY RETIREMENT PLAN
as 1:2012cv01881
Plaintiff:
NANCY L. COBB
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY RETIREMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
