Cases 91 - 100 of 130
Lindsey v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2013cv04069
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lindsey
Defendant:
Garry F McCarthy, John Doe 1-4, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2013cv03747
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clark
Defendant:
Garry F. McCarthy and Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDowell et al v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2013cv03410
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McDowell
Defendant:
Garry F McCarthy, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv50153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lewis v. Weis et al
as 1:2013cv02604
Plaintiff:
Martin Edward Lewis
Defendant:
Jody Weis, Garry F. McCarthy, Chicago Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2013cv02042
Plaintiff:
Kilroy Watkins
Defendant:
Rahm Emanuel, Garry McCarthy, Lisa Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2013cv01463
Plaintiff:
Alexis Gomez
Defendant:
Garry F. McCarthy and Unknown Police's Case #11CR1220101
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fonseca v. City of Chicago et al.
as 1:2013cv00605
Plaintiff:
Johnny Fonseca
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Garry F. McCarthy, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv00483
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Moore , Jaceta Smith and L. M.
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, The Chicago Police Department, Garry McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
