Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Boyd v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv00710
Defendant:
AFSCME Council 31 and City Of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Jason Smith, I v. Timothy Evans, et al
as 19-3512
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON SMITH, I
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, LEE SAUNDERS, TIMOTHY C. EVANS, Chief Judge and others
Jones v. AFSCME Council 31 et al
as 1:2019cv06793
Defendant:
AFSCME Council 31, Glendora Marshall, David Dover and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Theodis Chapman, et al v. AFSCME Council 31, Local 3477
as 19-2286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK NELSON and THEODIS CHAPMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
AFSCME COUNCIL 31, LOCAL 3477
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ahrens, Russell v. Local 643 Transit, AFSCME AFL-CIO et al
as 3:2019cv00499
Defendant:
Terry Williams, AFSCME, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO and Local 643 Transit, AFSCME AFL-CIO
Plaintiff:
Russell Ahrens
Bennett v. Council 31 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO et al
as 4:2019cv04087
Defendant:
Andrea Waintroob, Kwame Raoul, Lynne Sered and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Lett v. City of Chicago, et al
as 19-1463
Defendant / Appellee:
CIVILIAN OFFICE OF POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY, SHARON FAIRLEY, in her individual capacity, AFSCME LOCAL 654 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELVIN LETT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01539
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
