Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vela v. Rios et al
as 1:2012cv01108
Plaintiff:
Baltazar Vela
Defendant:
Richardo Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Lopez et al
as 1:2012cv02075
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Baltazar Lopez, Maria S Lopez and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baltazar v. Rios et al
as 1:2012cv01715
Petitioner:
Vela Baltazar
Respondent:
Richardo Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baltazar v. Ray Pollina Landscaping, Brick Paving and Snow Removal, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv06088
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Baltazar
Defendant:
Ray Pollina Landscaping, Brick Paving and Snow Removal, Inc. and Orazio Pollina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cisneros v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2011cv01677
Plaintiff:
Baltazar Cisneros
Defendant:
Gonzalez and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopez v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv08024
Plaintiff:
Jose Baltazar Lopez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Baltazar v. Teton Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04739
Plaintiff:
Jaime Baltazar
Defendant:
Teton Transportation, Inc., Teton Transportation, Inc., Charles M. Wender, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Kelly Baltazar v. Lillian Warden, et al
as 09-2167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLY BALTAZAR, Doctor
Defendant - Appellee:
LILLIAN S. WARDEN and ADVANCED HEALTHCARE ASSOCIATES, an Illinois corporation
Gordon et al v. Devine et al
as 1:2008cv00377
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gordon, Kenneth Gordon and Kenneth Gordon
Defendant:
Richard Devine, Merle Shearer, Unknown Assistant State's Attorneys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
