Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Pemberton v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv01370
Petitioner:
Devin A. Pemberton
Respondent:
USA, USP Marion and Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Annamalai v. Simpkins et al
as 3:2022cv02576
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Nathan Simpkins, Gary Burgess, Daniel Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv02579
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul, Nathan Simpkins, Annabell Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Jarrett, et al.
as 3:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Courtney Curtis
Defendant:
Counselor Jarrett, Lt. Brooks, Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christy v. Marion USP
as 3:2022cv02044
Plaintiff:
Shawn Christy
Defendant:
Marion USP, Daniel Sproul, John LeClair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pemberton v. USA
as 3:2022cv02079
Petitioner:
Devin A. Pemberton
Respondent:
USA and Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Annamalai v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul, Nathan Simpkins, Gary Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sullivan v. Sproul
as 3:2022cv01154
Petitioner:
Matthew G. Sullivan
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Al-Kassar v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv00984
Plaintiff:
Monzer Al-Kassar
Defendant:
Dan Sproul, Jeffrey Graeber, CTU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
