Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Kola v. Village of Harwood Heights et al
as 1:2013cv08923
Plaintiff:
John F Kola
Defendant:
Village of Harwood Heights , John Devries and Ronald J Zyniewicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braden v. Winkelman et al
as 1:2013cv02591
Plaintiff:
Azari Braden
Defendant:
Scott L. Winkelman , John DeVries, Victor Van Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harwood v. Bayer Shering Pharma AG et al
as 3:2010cv13317
Plaintiff:
Robin Harwood
Defendant:
Bayer Shering Pharma AG and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palacz v. Village of Harwood Heights
as 1:2010cv03413
Plaintiff:
Albert Palacz
Defendant:
Village of Harwood Heights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Schroeder v. Village of Harwood Heights et al
as 1:2008cv04721
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Schroeder and Thomas H. Schroeder
Defendant:
Village of Harwood Heights and Margaret Fuller
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Babula v. McNally et al
as 1:2008cv04018
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Babula
Defendant:
Robert McNally, Steven Kalck, James Blasz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gideon et al v. Grabert et al
as 1:2008cv02618
Plaintiff:
Dawn Gideon, Dawn Gideon, Dawn Gideon and others
Defendant:
Officer Barry Grabert, Officer Harwood and City of Waukegan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lorillard Tobacco Co, et al v. Z&M Quick Mart, et al
as 1:2003cv05311
Plaintiff:
Lorillard Tobacco Company
Defendant:
Z & M Quick Mart Inc, Nancy Y Youel, SAFA Ent Inc and others
Counter_claimant:
Kirk D Kiryakos
Counter_defendant:
Lorillard Tobacco Company
Respondent:
Sandra Hazemi, Allied Tobacco Consulting and Distribution, Inc. , Big Ash Fine Cigars and Tobacco Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
