Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Gaines v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06151
Plaintiff:
Tiera Gaines
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Devane v. Instant Brands LLC
as 1:2022cv04900
Plaintiff:
Tammy Devane
Defendant:
Instant Brands LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Fischer et al v. Instant Checkmate LLC.
as 1:2019cv04892
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lukis, Robert Fischer and Robert Harper
Defendant:
Instant Checkmate LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hess v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Clint Hess
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Havens et al v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02909
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc. formerly known as Double Insight, Inc. doing business as Instant Pot Company, Double Insight, Inc. and Instant Brands LLC
Plaintiff:
Michelle Havens and Elsie Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Instant Checkmate LLC v. Robert Fischer, et al
as 22-8005
Petitioner:
INSTANT CHECKMATE LLC
Respondent:
ROBERT FISCHER and STEPHANIE LUKIS
Butler v. Instant Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05012
Plaintiff:
Donna Ann Butler
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc. and Corelle Brands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deien v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 3:2021cv03159
Plaintiff:
Sondra Sue Deien
Defendant:
Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
La Fronza et al v. Instant Checkmate, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03025
Plaintiff:
Natalia Kupiec and Anna La Fronza
Defendant:
Instant Checkmate, LLC, PEOPLECONNECT, Inc. and Peopleconnect, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kupiec v. PeopleConnect, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00969
Plaintiff:
Natalia Kupiec
Defendant:
Instant Checkmate, LLC and PeopleConnect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
