Cases 11 - 20 of 2,723
Milons v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04620
Plaintiff:
Deandree Milons
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Correctional Sergeant Williams and John/Jane Doe #1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2024cv04099
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Elizabeth Schmidt, . Jumper, . Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04518
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dida v. Doe 1
as 3:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04522
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, John Doe 1, Susan Shobol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gully
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snow v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
Justin Snow
Defendant:
Anthony Grootens, Brian Curran, Deana Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyles v. Does
as 1:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
Terry Pyles
Defendant:
John/Jane Does and Joseph Rizzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
