Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Traharne v. IL DCFS et al
as 1:2015cv11133
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. J. Traharne
Defendant:
IL DCFS, Sharon Dorfman, Laurie Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J. K. J. v. Polk County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2015cv00428
Plaintiff:
J. K. J.
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Department and Darryl L. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
K & J Carlson, Inc. v. Yogeez, LLC
as 3:2014cv50086
Plaintiff:
K & J Carlson, Inc.
Defendant:
Yogeez, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Brakebush Brothers, Inc. et al v. K & J Transporting
as 3:2014cv00177
Plaintiff:
Brakebush Brothers, Inc. and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
K & J Transporting
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Haralson v. Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv08663
Plaintiff:
Wesley Haralson
Defendant:
City of Chicago , K. J. Mingari and E.K. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Board of Trustees of the Automobile Mechanics' Local No. 701 Union and Industry Pension Fund v. Avenue Motor Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01627
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Automobile Mechanics' Local No. 701 Union and Industry Pension Fund
Defendant:
Avenue Motor Sales, Inc. and K & J Motor Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Howard v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv03661
Plaintiff:
Ezzard C. Howard
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Jodi Wise, T.J. Jozefczak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Parkinson et al
as 1:2010cv07317
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Robert L. Parkinson, Walter E. Boomer, Blake E. Devitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin et al v. Morrin et al
as 1:2008cv05776
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Griffin
Defendant:
D. J. Morrin, S. R. Storck, Lawrence J. Herhold and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
