Cases 11 - 20 of 150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Oscar Marquez v. Daniel Sproul
as 23-3355
Petitioner / Appellant:
OSCAR A. MARQUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SPROUL, Warden
Johnson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50425
Plaintiff:
Tracy E. Johnson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Tarry Williams and Ramon Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernal et al v. Kohls Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01542
Petitioner:
ANA Bernal, Amiee Marquez, Krista Kelley and others
Respondent:
Kohls Corporation and Kohls Inc
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Gonzalez v. Marquez et al
as 1:2023cv15743
Plaintiff:
Christian A. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Officer Marquez, Officer Borrero, Sgt. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Raul v. Crane et al
as 1:2023cv14748
Plaintiff:
Pinchas E. Raul
Defendant:
Christopher M. Crane, Joseph Dominguez, Anne R. Pramaggiore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Marquez v. Jerome
as 2:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Orlando Marquez
Defendant:
Dr Robert Jerome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bergeron Davila v. Marquez et al
as 2:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Bergeron Davila
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquez v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11384
Plaintiff:
Nancy Marquez
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
