Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Hughes v. Pineda et al
as 1:2019cv04915
Defendant:
Fraticola, Luppino, Golik and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv02487
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes
Defendant:
Cook County, Ex-cop Supt., Unknown Supervisor (s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Simpson et al
as 3:2019cv03064
Defendant:
Sally Hougas, Sandra Simpson and Gregg Scott
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv03063
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Superintendant Yoksoulian, B. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JCR Produce Co. v. National Produce Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01151
Plaintiff:
JCR Produce Co.
Defendant:
National Produce Sales, Inc., David M. El-Aboudi and Michael Hughes
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Quality Food Products, Inc.
Movant:
CR ADVENTURES LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Hughes v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv01315
Petitioner:
Michael Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Earthmix Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. National Produce Sales, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09243
Plaintiff:
Earthmix Fruit & Vegetable Co.
Defendant:
National Produce Sales, Inc., David M. El-Aboudi and Michael Hughes
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Michael Hughes v. James Dimas, et al
as 16-1818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DIMAS, Secretary, GREGG SCOTT, Senior Program Director, LIBERTY HEALTHCARE CORPORATION and others
Hughes v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02323
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes v. Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04163
Plaintiff:
Michael Hughes
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
