Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Harry Schmidt, Jr. v. Nancy Bowens, et al
as 18-1490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY G. SCHMIDT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY BOWENS and CHRISTINE FOWLER
Buechel v. O'Donnell et al
as 2:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Robert J Buechel
Defendant:
Craig O'Donnell , Brad Hompe, Lori Doehling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Benson v. Nancy Bowens, et al
as 18-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY BOWENS, DANIELLE FOSTER, THERESA MURPHY and others
Covington v. Bowens et al
as 2:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Reo Covington
Defendant:
Nancy Bowens , P Murphy and Nurse Melanie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Bowens et al
as 2:2017cv01618
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Patterson
Defendant:
Nancy Bowens , Foster, Fofona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Benson v. Nancy Bowens, et al
as 17-2804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY BOWENS, DANIELLE FOSTER, THERESA MURPHY and others
Rodolph Lanaghan v. Darryl Koch, et al
as 17-1399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODOLPH LANAGHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRYL KOCH, Correctional Officer, JAMES CHASE, NANCY BOWEN, Nurse and others
Benson v. Bowens et al
as 2:2016cv01589
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Delane Benson
Defendant:
Nancy Bowens, Danielle Foster, Theresa Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLarwell v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony DeLarwell
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , Wisconsin Correctional Center System, Badger Health Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schuenke, Lloyd v. Wisconsin Department of Correction's et al
as 3:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lloyd T. Schuenke
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Correction's , Edward Wall , Deirdre Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
