Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Donelson v. U.S. of America et al
as 1:2020cv00295
Defendant:
Police Officers John Doe, Hugh Hurwitz, Officer Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Donelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knope, Kevin v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2017cv00548
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Knope
Defendant:
Scott Kevin Walker, State of Wisconsin, City of Sun Prairie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virgil et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv09966
Plaintiff:
Daniel Virgil and Sade Dupree
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Ronald Schmuck and Chicago Police Officers John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bussie v. Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv10276
Plaintiff:
Charda Bussie
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Michael Vasquez, Phillip Kwasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray et al v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2014cv01308
Plaintiff:
Dejohn McCray and Chicago Police Officer John Doe
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gomez v. Summit Police officer John Doe et al
as 1:2013cv06620
Plaintiff:
Rangel Gomez
Defendant:
Summit Police officer John Doe and Village of Summit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Chicago Police Officer John Doe
as 1:2013cv05545
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Watkins
Defendant:
Chicago Police Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2013cv03135
Plaintiff:
Calvin Christian, III
Defendant:
City of Springfield , Michelle Awe , C. Vollmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rauschert v. LaSalle County et al
as 1:2012cv06354
Defendant:
LaSalle County, City of Spring Valley, Edward Jauch and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Rauschert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Huon v. Mudge et al
as 3:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Meanith Huon
Defendant:
William Mudge , Chris Hoell , Amy Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
