Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Rivas MD v. Stachula et al
as 1:2012cv05761
Plaintiff:
Joseph R Rivas MD
Defendant:
C.D. Stachula, M.K. Elliston, M.A. Amati and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matichak v. M.A. Mortenson Company
as 1:2011cv09187
Defendant:
M.A. Mortenson Company
Plaintiff:
David Matichak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGrath v. M.A. Mortenson Company et al
as 1:2011cv01644
Plaintiff:
Laurence McGrath
Defendant:
M.A. Mortenson Company , Tonn and Blank Construction, LLC , Huggett-Betten Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perkins et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Darnez Perkins and Mickin Perkins
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Lt. Dedore, J. M. O'Shaughnessy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Pollard
as 3:2009cv00535
Petitioner:
Jermaine M.A. White
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2009cv02943
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Hill
Defendant:
M.A. Rodriguez and J.A. Pedraza, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birgman v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv03274
Plaintiff:
Patrick Birgman
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, M.A. Bosch and M.C. Ventura
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Jackson Park Hospital et al
as 1:2008cv00835
Plaintiff:
Quinshela Turner
Defendant:
Jackson Park Hospital, J Madhani, D. Mufuka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Echenique v. Jaurique et al
as 1:2008cv00938
Plaintiff:
Francisco Echenique and Francisco Echenique
Defendant:
A.T. Jaurique, M.A. Vazquez and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
