Cases 21 - 30 of 303
Jeffery Grimes v. Roy Cheatam, et al
as 22-2128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY GRIMES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY CHEATAM, WARDEN CIOLLI, UNIT TEAM MANAGER KNIKS and others
Walker v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv01162
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Defendant:
D. Brookhart, Ethan McQueen, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Beatty, Sr. v. Chaplain Hinshaw, et al
as 22-1701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BEATTY, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAPLAIN HINSHAW and COUNSELOR HOOLEY
Mansoori v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv01638
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Mansoori
Defendant:
Counselor Martinez, Tom Dart and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Youngman et al
as 3:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
Spencer Martin
Defendant:
C/O Youngman, C/O Montroy, C/O Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Knox et al
as 1:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
Lynn Hicks
Defendant:
Edmond Knox, Tiffany H. Higes and Maria M. Barlow doing business as The Law Office of Maria M. Barlow LLC Attorney and Counselor at Law et, al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Amaya v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2021cv01707
Plaintiff:
Daniel Amaya
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Scott Thompson, Jeffrey M. Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Warden Gomez et al
as 1:2021cv06635
Plaintiff:
Karlton K. Brown
Defendant:
Warden Gomez, NRC Record Office, Counselor Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv06611
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Banks
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Doe, Muhammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Gondek et al
as 1:2021cv06542
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
E. Gondek, A. McGee, Y. Tefledzhuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
