Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Tompkins v. Marshall County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2020cv00006
Defendant:
Holcomb, Hassel, Marshall County Sheriffs Department and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda J Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Marshall County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2019cv01410
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriff's Department, Wayne Strawn, . Hatton and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Marshall County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2019cv01372
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriffs Dept., Wayne Strawn and Dr. Hatton
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Marshall County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 3:2019cv01108
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriffs Dept, Beau Holcomb and Matthew Hassel
Plaintiff:
Jose A Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Falls v. Marshall County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 3:2019cv01118
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriffs Dept, Beau Holcomb and Matthew Hassel
Plaintiff:
Martin D Falls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottrell v. Marshall County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv01043
Defendant:
Hancock, Crawford, Wagers and others
Plaintiff:
David William Boone Cottrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blount v. Marshall County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00958
Defendant:
Holcomb and Marshall County Jail
Plaintiff:
Matthew Blount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Marshall County, Indiana et al
as 3:2019cv00842
Defendant:
Marshall County, Indiana and MARSHALL COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff:
JAMES MILLER, CODY DEERY, JAMES RODGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Marshall County Jail
as 3:2019cv00771
Defendant:
Marshall County Jail
Plaintiff:
James L Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Marshal County Jail
as 3:2019cv00768
Plaintiff:
Kourtney Robert Thompson Gibbs
Defendant:
Marshal County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
