Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Big Jim Enterprises, Inc. v. Paccar, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Big Jim Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Paccar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alfdex AB et al v. Paccar, Inc.
as 3:2014cv50038
Plaintiff:
Alfdex AB and Alfa Laval Corporate AB
Defendant:
Paccar, Inc.
Movant:
Hengst SE & Co. KG
Counter_claimant:
Hengst SE & Co. KG and Paccar, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Alfa Laval Corporate AB and Alfdex AB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Leisher v. Paccar Inc et al
as 3:2013cv50003
Defendant:
Paccar Inc and Kenworth Truck Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Leisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
JAMES MICHAEL LEASING COMPANY, LLC v. PACCAR, INC.
as 1:2012mc00022
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL LEASING COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
PACCAR, INC.
Ravizza v. PACCAR Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv01326
Defendant:
PACCAR Inc and Kenworth Truck Company
Plaintiff:
Quentin Ravizza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Michael Leasing Company LLC v. PACCAR Inc
as 2:2011cv00747
Plaintiff:
James Michael Leasing Company LLC
Defendant:
PACCAR Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Double Time Transportation Inc v. PACCAR Inc
as 2:2010cv00202
Plaintiff:
Double Time Transportation Inc
Defendant:
PACCAR Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brogle v. PACCAR Inc
as 2:2009cv01167
Plaintiff:
Robert Brogle
Defendant:
PACCAR Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Diaz v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jesse Diaz
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Allied Manufacturing Company, American Standard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Diaz v. A W Chesterton Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jesse Diaz and Jesse Diaz
Defendant:
A W Chesterton Inc, Allied Manufacturing Company, American Standard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
