Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Regions Bank v. Fausz, et al
as 3:2017cv00853
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Raymond G. Fausz, Jr., Annette M. Fausz, ARay, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00934
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PTI Securities & Futures LP v. Haney, et al
as 1:2017cv01377
Plaintiff:
PTI Securities & Futures LP and Daniel Haugh
Defendant:
Ernestine Haney, Nellie Ree Burkett, Sharon E Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. 520 Deer Meadow Chatham Illinois et al
as 3:2015cv03264
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
520 Deer Meadow Chatham Illinois, 1124 South Sixth Street Springfield Illinois, 2010 BMW XI 535 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
SUD Family Limited Partnership et al v. Regions Bank et al
as 1:2015cv01210
Plaintiff:
SUD Family Limited Partnership , Sud's of Peoria, Inc , Sud's Motor Car Company and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank and DCR Mortgage VI Sub IV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
