Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Gorbey v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50163
Petitioner:
Michael Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorbey v. USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv50160
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickling, Sr. v. Waltert et al
as 3:2022cv50168
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Mickling, Sr.
Defendant:
Waltert, Heim, U.S.P. Thomson Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Owens v. Warden - U.S.P. Thomson
as 3:2022cv50218
Petitioner:
Lesley Owens
Respondent:
Warden - U.S.P. Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oliver v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50108
Plaintiff:
Arrington Oliver
Defendant:
David Gonzales, Thomas Bergami and Wardens of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gorbey v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv03075
Petitioner:
Michael Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gorbey v. USP Thomson
as 3:2022cv03076
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sykes v. Warden, FCI Thomson
as 1:2022cv02210
Petitioner:
Terrance Sykes
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Oliver v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
Arrington Oliver
Defendant:
David Gonzales, Thomas Bergami and Wardens of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Spiker v. Erskines et al
as 3:2022cv50053
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Spiker and Melissa A. Spiker
Defendant:
Robert E. Erskines, Six Unknown U.S.P. Thomson Officers, D. Gonzales, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
