Cases 21 - 30 of 137
WALSH v. PROTECTION PLUS, INC., et al
as 1:2022cv00919
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor and MARTIN J. WALSH
Defendant:
Protection Plus, Inc.,, Raymond Stanley, an individual,, PROTECTION PLUS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walsh v. Fensler et al
as 1:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, and Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
David Fensler, John Fernandez, Gary Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Roger Reed v. LABR, et al
as 22-1235
Petitioner:
ROGER REED
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Interested Party:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine v. LABR, et al
as 22-1141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor
Walsh v. McDevitt
as 2:2021cv02225
Plaintiff:
Martin J Walsh, Secretary of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Lee A McDevitt doing business as Midwest Home Care
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Michael Brousil v. LABR
as 21-1532
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. BROUSIL
Theresa Garner v. DOJ, et al
as 20-3259
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. D'ALESSANDRO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THERESA GARNER
v. RCA Roofing and Construction Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00946
Defendant:
RCA Roofing and Construction Inc. and United States Department of Labor
Apostolos Xanthopoulos v. LABR
as 20-2604
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Interested Party:
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.
Petitioner:
APOSTOLOS XANTHOPOULOS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
