Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Peppers v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv09115
Plaintiff:
Brain David Peppers
Defendant:
Sara F Jones, James Landeros, Unkown Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Rozak et al
as 1:2017cv02230
Plaintiff:
Ian Kelly Clark
Defendant:
Daniel J Rozak, Andrea Lynn Chasteen, Erin M. Krone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treece v. Madigan et al
as 2:2017cv02029
Plaintiff:
James Loren Treece
Defendant:
Lisa M Madigan, James W Glasgow, James A Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Wilson v. IDFPR, et al
as 16-1831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LANCE WILSON, D.O.
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ANDREW GORCHYNSKY, MITRA B. KALELKAR and others
Burley v. Bollingbrook Police Dept et al
as 1:2016cv04289
Plaintiff:
Diane E. Burley, Melissa Agunloye and D'Anne Burley
Defendant:
Bollingbrook Police Dept, Tom Ross, James Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith et al v. Glasgow et al
as 1:2016cv02316
Plaintiff:
Deshawn B Smith and Martell K Jones
Defendant:
James W. Glasgow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Kelly et al
as 1:2015cv06506
Plaintiff:
Ian Kelly Clark
Defendant:
Mike Kelly, Daniel J Rozak, Frank A. Astrella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bocock v. Will County et al
as 1:2015cv02016
Plaintiff:
Charles Bocock
Defendant:
Will County, Dino Dabezic, Richard J Wistocki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glasgow v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 3:2015px00122
Plaintiff:
Charleen A Glasgow
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Kalelkar et al
as 1:2014cv10521
Plaintiff:
Robert Lance Wilson
Defendant:
Mitra B Kalelkar, Edmund R Donoghue, Office of the Cook County Medical Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
