Cases 31 - 40 of 58
MCINTOSH et al v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00222
Plaintiff:
CARL MCINTOSH and ANY OTHER SUCCESSORS TO THEIR OFFICES, ET AL.
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, M NALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00223
Plaintiff:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH, B. R. JETT, ANTHONY BOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00215
Petitioner:
NOAH R. ROBINSON
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
OVERTON v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00206
Petitioner:
ANDREA OVERTON
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WALLS v. FCI TERRE HAUTE MEDICAL STAFF, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN et al
as 2:2007cv00185
Plaintiff:
RICKY L WALLS
Defendant:
FCI TERRE HAUTE MEDICAL STAFF, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN, DR.WEBSTER, R V VEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BULLIS v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00184
Petitioner:
STEPHAN BULLIS
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HINOJOSA v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00181
Petitioner:
MARCOS HINOJOSA
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOONE v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00177
Petitioner:
GARY DEAN BOONE
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH, UNKNOWN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C2 and UNKNOWN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OF F2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
