Cases 31 - 40 of 4,563
Njus v. McFarland
as 1:2024cv01263
Respondent:
Amy McFarland
Petitioner:
Joel Nelson Njus
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akhmetova v. MADSEN et al
as 1:2024cv06565
Defendant:
Director at FBI Christopher Wray, Director at USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou, US Attorney's O Morris Pasqual and others
Plaintiff:
Zhanna Akhmetova
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Omar et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2024cv06230
Defendant:
Rena Bitter, Rohit Nepal, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Fida Wael Omar and Wael Ghannam
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Griffin v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01260
Petitioner:
Keith Griffin
Respondent:
Chance Jones
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Olson v. Reed et al
as 2:2024cv00916
Defendant:
Thomas H Reed, Jeremiah C Van Hecke, Sara N Sadowski and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Luther Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gladis Chavez-Pineda, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-2224
Petitioner:
A. G. C. and GLADIS YOLANDA CHAVEZ-PINEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Farris v. Danley et al
as 2:2024cv02144
Defendant:
Jesse Paul Danley, Kirk Kepley, Chad Schwenke and others
Plaintiff:
James Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
